What happens when the things meant to bring us together become unaffordable? Popular public gatherings have become increasingly (and unnecessarily) costly. In a world where weekly groceries can drain a bank account, it’s hard to imagine many people prioritizing spending money on community events. This is harmful for reasons worth talking about.

Thriving communities are not built through isolation. Even on a smaller scale, like the street you live on; something as simple as a cookout can keep social circles alive. But when an unattainable price tag is unapologetically attached to these community pillars, isolation starts to look far more convenient.

Recently, the annual U.S. Open has faced scrutiny over steep admission and food prices, which discouraged many from attending. According to reporting from The New York Times and Reuters, general admission tickets averaged around $300, with grounds passes hovering near $350 on resale platforms.

Billionaires and everyday spectators alike have questioned how these raised prices align with the values of the United States Tennis Association. The USTA describes the Open’s nonprofit mission as sharing the game with everyone. But with prices like these, “everyone” effectively means “anyone who can afford it,” which excludes a significant portion of the public.

The issue with this uptick in event pricing is bigger than some may think. Shared experiences are vital to community life, and separating who can attend based on cost only deepens existing divides. When participation becomes a luxury, connection becomes unaffordable and communities lose something essential. 

But the history of community gathering shows that accessibility does not have to come at the expense of celebration.

History offers examples of communities finding ways to make togetherness accessible despite financial hardship. During the early 20th century, Black communities in Harlem developed “rent parties,” gatherings that helped people raise money for rent while creating opportunities for music, dancing and social connection. Particularly among Black domestic workers facing housing discrimination and economic hardship, these parties conjoined mutual aid and community celebration. The practice demonstrates that community events do not need to be expensive to be meaningful; in fact, their value can come from the very fact that everyone can participate.

If public gatherings continue drifting out of reach, we risk normalizing a version of community life where only the financially comfortable get access to joy, culture and belonging. That is corrosive. A society that prices out togetherness should not be surprised when people stop showing up.